It's the Fourth
Quarter
There’s been a flurry of interest lately on
the part of the lobster fishermen as to what rules may be enacted in
the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s latest addition to
its Lobster Plan. Maybe
the awakening occurred when word reached the dock that “they” were
talking about minimum size increases and historical participation
requirements on trap numbers. Whoa there, we can hear it
now, “they can talk all they want as long as they only propose
things that I already do or have and besides, why are we supposed to
do anything anyway?” This then returns the entire conversation back
to the decade old epic tale of lobster biology, computer models and
federal laws.
Regardless of what has spurred the interest,
the industry’s Lobster Conservation Management Teams, the LCMT’s,
after months of lonely, agonizing debates and compromises, have
suddenly found the guest list at their meetings growing with newly
interested parties who want to oppose whatever is being considered
that might affect them.
Actually it isn’t bad that there is more interest because at
least fishermen may be realizing that maybe, just maybe, fishermen
with a game plan are being listened to at the management level. This is progress and it is
true, they are listening, at least in the Atlantic States Management
process. Then too, it
seems that most fishermen are beginning to better understand the
process and science driving that process. They certainly don’t agree
with all the science factors, nor should they, but now at least,
they’re in the same ballpark with the managers and scientists and
have managed to field a team to play in the
game.
Understandably, these newly arrived fishermen are
busy, tired and want to voice their concerns and although it is now
the last quarter of this crucial game, they are welcome. These new players, however,
must understand the rules of engagement and be willing to contribute
constructively rather then destructively to the
process.
It should also be remembered that there have
been fishermen who also have been busy and tired
who have been paying close attention all along and have been
participating and carrying the ball. It should be noted here that
virtually every suggestion that has come from fishermen has been
examined and the merits, drawbacks and feasibility of each idea has
been debated back and forth for, in some cases, several
years.
There has been, however, all too many who
have known that the process has been going on but perhaps thought
that it was all going to just go away. Well, no, it hasn’t and no,
it won’t until the goals are
met.
There has been a concerted effort by the industry reps during
this process to satisfy the biologists, the managers, the legal
mandates and also to make the most painless yet feasible and fair
proposals for the lobster fishermen. Basically, these area
delegates, the LCMT’s, have done their job and yes there are a few
hesitant state government managers who are casting a suspicious eye
at some of the proposals, and
we won’t name any states
here.
We hope the increased interest by fishermen
in this planning process continues. We hope they understand that
they must follow through with the game plans if or when they are
approved. We also
expect that there will be a lot of activity from the sidelines and a
lot of Monday morning quarterbacks who will be replaying the field
from their piers, coffee shops and taverns after the touchdown pass
has been thrown. If there are, so be
it!
Hike,
Bill Adler Executive
Director
02/02
|