
AN
ACT THAT DESERVES TO BE ENDANGERED
The Endangered species Act as it stands today however, has
gone radically astray. Environmental
extremists have managed to work the provisions of the Act into the realm of
ridiculousness and to a point where it has become an unacceptable and
unnecessary burden on many segments of this society.
The ability to “list” ones favorite endangered species
and thus place them under the protection of this law has resulted in a steadily
increasing list of “sacred” creatures.
At this point farmers now find it hard to farm, woodsmen can’t cut
trees, fishermen are being threatened with closures to fishing and the list of
those being restricted continues to mount.
In most cases, as we know, it isn’t the crop or trees or fish that are
under protection, it is some obscure creature of the field, the woods, or the
sea that has brought down the weight of this law on these operations.
Increasingly, we are protecting birds, bugs, butterflies, mammals, moths,
plants, rodents and the list goes on. It
is interesting to note that this whole process has become so out of control that
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had, a few years ago, actually announced that
it was suspending the listing of any more species under this Act.
As most of us know, the ESA has come into play in the
lobster fishing world in the name of saving whales. As written, it has placed the fishermen and the National
Marine Fisheries Service in an almost impossible situation. With regard to endangered whales, it allows zero takes and
basically defines “a take” as harassing, impeding, bumping, interrupting,
getting too close to, entangling, injuring or killing a whale.
It is unreasonable and unforgiving.
This is also why the environmental groups launch their legal attacks
using this law rather then the more moderate Marine Mammal Protection Act.
The ESA has been due for a reauthorization process in
Congress for several years now and no action has been taken because it’s
considered a political hot potato. Environmental
groups have been keeping political pressure on legislators to not bring
the Act up for the process fearing that it could be gutted by the increasing
number of politicians who have had enough of the lunacy.
It is true that reauthorizing the ESA would probably be a long and
political sensitive process and who knows how it would turn out.
Another interesting question that should be explored either technically
or legally, is whether the law even exists today since it has expired?
Now there’s an interesting thought!
The legislative legal beagles, however, have been insisting that such a
law continues to exist in its current form until it is reauthorized.
On yet another level, laws can be changed or abolished.
It has happened and the ESA is becoming a prime candidate.
As an example, we have all heard of that infamous law that resulted in
what is known as Prohibition. Actually
it was a Constitutional Amendment adopted in 1919, the 18th
Amendment. Basically, this measure
prohibited legal drinking of alcohol, to be blunt.
It spurred the era of backroom, undercover, crime ridden social upheaval
over alcoholic beverages. The law
may have been well intended but it became a social and enforcement nightmare and
was repealed by the 21st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1933.
The point here is that laws can be changed if they become over burdensome
or ridiculous.
In the case of the Endangered Species Act, we feel it is
time that this unreasonable and over burdensome U.S. law be repealed or at the
very least be modified to bring it back to some level of reasonability.
The phrase “all things in moderation” is frequently used
to promote a better way of doing something.
In trying to protect declining species, maintain support for that
protection and protect the sanity of society as well as, in our case, our
fishermen, it is time to either do this type of protection in a more moderate
way or allow the ESA itself to go the way of prohibition and the dinosaur.
Can I save my favorite bug – the mosquito?
Bill Adler
Executive Director
5/05