
THE
DEPARTMENT OF NON-SENSICAL DECISIONS
As the massive Salem to Weymouth gas pipeline project winds
down over budget and way behind schedule, it was supposed to be done in June,
yet another fiasco has developed involving the lobster resource in the area.
This time it wasn’t the pipeline people but rather the Commonwealth’s
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) that has managed to stumble over
the rock of common sense.
The DEP is the state agency that issues the permits and one
of its requirements has been that the project must, after burying the pipe,
return the bottom contour to within one foot of the way it was before they
started. This seemed at first to be
a reasonable requirement. As
prescribed in the project’s agenda, rock had been dumped and concrete mats had
been laid over the buried pipe to protect it.
The plan was then to drag a bar along the rock line and level it to
fulfill the permit obligation.
A strange or maybe not a strange thing happened,
however, on the way to getting all this done.
Lobsters moved into the area and found that the rock line was a great
place to live even if it might only be for a temporary stay in the area.
The project had inadvertently created a better habitat and the lobsters
found it. Fishermen working along
the line in November noted that a new wave of eggers, lots of them, had taken up
residence in the area.
As the project moved along it became time to level
those rocks. The MLA, as well as
the Division of Marine Fisheries, requested that the DEP change its permit
mandate and direct the project managers to cancel this part of the job or at
least delay the process because of the influx of lobsters that had moved in.
The project managers, naturally, were receptive to the idea of
eliminating this part of the requirement.
In late November came word that the DEP was not
supportive of the idea and expected the leveling job to be done as per the
permit requirement.
The Division of Marine Fisheries, the lobster
fishermen and everyone else involved in lobster management have spent countless
hours and even years designing plans that all add up to trying to increase the
number of egg bearing lobsters and then also to protect them in one way or
another. It is ironic and
discouraging that this other state agency would not heed the comments and advice
from their sister agency or from the industry.
Instead, they apparently have pushed ahead compelling the project to
level the line and potentially kill many eggers as well as other lobsters and
destroy what has become good lobster habitat.
One might wonder if the Department of Environmental Protection is
really interested is protecting this part of the environment or just interested
in protecting words in a written permit.
As an aside, it is interesting but not surprising that the
so-called “environmental - conservation” network have been nowhere to be
found and knew nothing about this. They
are, however, always around when the issue is stopping fishermen from fishing
because they are perceived to be hurting the resource or the habitat.
The inability of the DEP to adjust its requirement
regarding the leveling of this habitat is likely to have ramifications beyond
this one issue. When the state’s
DMF and other managing agencies come knocking on the lobster industry door
wanting more rules to protect lobsters, increase egg production or just improve
habitat, why should fishermen be willing to do more? Why should they when some other state agency, other then the
DMF can issue permits for projects that undo what resource managers and the
industry have been trying to accomplish? This
pipeline project is, as we all know, just one of several projects past, present
and future where this type of mismatch has occurred or may occur in the future.
We can site dredging projects, sand mining and windmills just for
starters.
Any state agency that deals with the protection of our
environment and here it’s our marine environment, needs to be more flexible
and receptive to using some common sense when it involves the ever changing
world in the sea. They could start
by listening and hearing what their sister agency and the state’s
lobster industry is saying.
We are appalled by the lack of sensitivity
demonstrated by the Massachusetts DEP towards this states’ lobster resource
and its fishermen by compelling this pipeline project to move forward with the
unnecessary damaging of the lobsters and their new found habitat.
Does the state have a Department of Common Sense?
Bill Adler
Executive Director